Dear Visitor,

Our system has found that you are using an ad-blocking browser add-on.

We just wanted to let you know that our site content is, of course, available to you absolutely free of charge.

Our ads are the only way we have to be able to bring you the latest high-quality content, which is written by professional journalists, with the help of editors, graphic designers, and our site production and I.T. staff, as well as many other talented people who work around the clock for this site.

So, we ask you to add this site to your Ad Blocker’s "white list" or to simply disable your Ad Blocker while visiting this site.

Continue on this site freely
You are here: Home / Apple/Mac / Apple Accused of Antitrust Violations
Suit Demands Apple License Microsoft DRM
Suit Demands Apple License Microsoft DRM
By Richard Koman / CRM Daily Like this on Facebook Tweet this Link thison Linkedin Link this on Google Plus
Nothing breeds lawsuits like success. And for Apple, the New Year is bringing a rash of them. Earlier this week, Apple disclosed in filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission that an iPod customer, Melanie Tucker, has filed a suit against the company, claiming that Apple violates antitrust laws by not allowing music bought on iTunes to be played on non-Apple music players.

Tucker is seeking class-action status and asking the U.S. District Court for Northern California to force Apple to make iTunes purchases compatible with devices other than the iPod and to pay damages to anyone who bought an iPod or iTunes track after April 28, 2003.

On New Year's Eve, another iPod buyer, Stacie Somers, filed a similar suit, also seeking class-action status. Somers is claiming that Apple illegally restrains competition by not making its music compatible with Microsoft's Windows Media Audio (WMA) format. Like Tucker, Somers alleges that by making iTunes music incompatible with non-iPod players, Apple violates antitrust laws.

Somers' suit contends that Apple could license WMA for 3 cents per iPod -- or a mere $800,000, a figure based on 2005 iPod sales.

Apple 'Refuses' To License WMA

Somers specifically claims that Apple's digital music preferences violate the Clayton Act, Cartwright Act, California's Unfair Competition Law, the Sherman Antitrust Act, and other antitrust laws.

The suit notes that most online music vendors, including AOL, Best Buy, MusicMatch, Napster, Yahoo, and Virgin Digital, sell music in the WMA format, but Apple "refuses" to do so and "refuses" to make its AAC files compatible with media players other than the iPod.

The suit even alleges that Apple intentionally cripples WMA-playback capabilities in the iPod. "Apple's crippleware operating system software prevents the iPod Shuffle from playing WMA files," according to the complaint.

"There is no appropriate or legitimate business justification" for Apple's actions, the suit contends.

Valid Business Judgment

The allegation that Apple is doing wrong by not supporting Microsoft's DRM might strike some observers as absurd. If Apple did support Microsoft DRM, some might argue, then Microsoft would have a monopoly of its own in the online music business.

By declining to give Microsoft such leverage, Apple arguably is exercising its valid business judgment as to how to conduct its affairs. Under the business judgment rule, courts are reluctant to interfere in a company's decision-making, in the absence of intent to restrict trade.

Indeed, Apple can argue that consumers have more of a choice because they can choose an iPod with Apple's AAC file format or another device with Microsoft's. In addition, the suits' allegations might be somewhat blunted by the fact that Apple now offers tracks from EMI in DRM-free versions.

Unlike other suits that complain about tying iPods to iTunes, "this is the first time Apple has been charged with trying to muscle Microsoft out of the market," Fortune's Philip Elmer-DeWitt wrote.

Read more on: Apple, iPod, Music, iTunes, Microsoft
Tell Us What You Think


Like Us on FacebookFollow Us on Twitter

The British government officially blamed Russia for waging the so-called NotPetya cyberattack that infected computers across Ukraine before spreading to systems in the U.S. and beyond.
Security software company McAfee has adapted to many changes over the years, but Chief Executive Chris Young says one thing has remained constant: "our commitment to protecting everyone."
© Copyright 2018 NewsFactor Network. All rights reserved. Member of Accuserve Ad Network.