HOME     MENU     SEARCH     NEWSLETTER    
CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT NEWS. UPDATED 13 MINUTES AGO.
You are here: Home / Apple/Mac / Google, Rockstar Suit Stays in Calif.
Google, Rockstar Patent Fight Stays in California
Google, Rockstar Patent Fight Stays in California
By Seth Fitzgerald / CRM Daily Like this on Facebook Tweet this Link thison Linkedin Link this on Google Plus
PUBLISHED:
APRIL
18
2014



A U.S. district judge has ruled in favor of Google by deciding that the Apple-backed Rockstar Consortium will have to fight its legal battles in California rather than Texas. Rockstar filed a lawsuit against Google and other Android phone companies last October. Since patent holders have a better track record of winning cases in Texas, Rockstar created a co-plaintiff, MobileStar Technologies in Plano, Texas, so that it could file the lawsuit there.

The seven patents involved in the lawsuit have allegedly been infringed upon by Google’s search and advertising business, which then brings other Android device manufacturers into the mix as they rely on Google’s services.

Last month, the two companies made their arguments regarding the venue dispute. Google lawyer Matthew Warren made the argument that because Apple contributed the most cash to buying the Nortel patents, the lawsuit should take place in Apple’s state, California.

A Strong Link

U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken ruled almost entirely in Google’s favor because of a link between Rockstar and Apple that she feels cannot be ignored. Apple contributed $2.6 of the $4.5 billion needed to buy the patents and also received more than half of those patents when the sale occurred. As a result, Wilken ruled that the majority of Rockstar is actually controlled by Apple and the lawsuit should be handled as such, even if they are technically separate companies.

The bid to move the case to Texas was justified by Rockstar because its co-plaintiff, MobileStar, claims Texas as its primary business location. However, given the evidence, Wilken views MobileStar as a “sham” company that exists simply to provide Rockstar with a way to have the case moved to a friendlier jurisdiction.

“The circumstances here strongly suggest that Rockstar formed MobileStar as a sham entity for the sole purpose of avoiding jurisdiction in all other fora except MobileStar’s state of incorporation (Delaware) and claimed principal place of business (Texas),” wrote Wilken. “A mere day before it initiated litigation against Google’s customers, Rockstar freshly minted MobileStar, with no California contacts, and assigned the asserted patents to that subsidiary.”

The Real Case

Now that the venue dispute has been settled, the actual patent lawsuit can begin. As with most patent lawsuits that have taken place in the technology industry, many view the patents in question as “standard-essential," which means that the protected ideas are not unique and must be used by other members of the industry.

We caught up with John Allison, Professor of Intellectual Property at the University of Texas, to get his opinion on standard-essential patents and reforming the patent system as a whole. He told us that it is difficult to determine the true breadth of any given patent but that he has supported The Innovation Act, a bill that fights back against so-called patent trolls.

“You can’t determine the breadth of a patent just by looking at its title, the abstract, or even the preamble to a claim. You must study the precise language of the claims to determine what limitations are placed on the initial broad language,” said Allison. “The question is what does 'reform' mean? Such a complex system must be changed only with great care.”

Rockstar, as the plaintiff in the case, could attempt to settle in a variety of ways by either setting up patent licensing deals, requesting a cash settlement, or seeking a sales ban against certain devices.

Read more on: Apple, Google, Android, Copyright
Tell Us What You Think
Comment:

Name:

Like Us on FacebookFollow Us on Twitter
TOP STORIES NOW
MAY INTEREST YOU
Forrester study shows 187% ROI with Druva Endpoint Backup: In a commissioned study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of Druva, Forrester found that the costs and benefits for a composite organization with 3,000 inSync users, based on customer interviews, are: 1) 187% return on investment, and 2) Total cost savings and benefits of $3.8 million. Click here to access the study now.
MORE IN APPLE/MAC
Product Information and Resources for Technology You Can Use To Boost Your Business

NETWORK SECURITY SPOTLIGHT
Using Internet-connected devices without strong passwords is inherently risky, as illustrated by reports that a Russian Web site is showing live footage from thousands of people's webcams.

ENTERPRISE HARDWARE SPOTLIGHT
Doctor Who had K-9, the robot dog that accompanied him on adventures through space. Now, Mountain View has K5, a 5-foot-tall, 300-pound robot security guard patrolling in the Bay Area.

MOBILE TECHNOLOGY SPOTLIGHT
To better its customer service, Comcast is pulling out at least some of the stops. The cable giant has launched an app so you can track the cable guy in real time. It's designed to ease customer frustration.

© Copyright 2014 NewsFactor Network, Inc. All rights reserved. Member of Accuserve Ad Network.