Newsletters
Customer Relationship Management News NewsFactor Sites:       NewsFactor.com     Enterprise Security Today     CRM Daily     Business Report     Sci-Tech Today  
   
This ad will display for the next 20 seconds. Please click for more information, or scroll down to pass the ad, or Close Ad.
Home CRM Systems Customer Service Business Intelligence Sales & Marketing More Topics...
Build Apps 5x Faster
For Half the Cost
Enterprise Cloud Computing

On Force.com
Network Security
Real-time info services with Neustar
Average Rating:
Rate this article:  
RSA
RSA 'Categorically Denies' Secret NSA Payout

By Jennifer LeClaire
December 24, 2013 10:49AM

Bookmark and Share
EMC subsidiary RSA said it has worked with the NSA as a vendor and an active member of the security community. However, it has never entered into any contract with the NSA -- or any other entity -- or engaged in any project with the intention of weakening RSA’s products, or introducing potential "backdoors" into its products for anyone’s use.
 


After Reuters broke a story that the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) arranged a secret $10 million contract with RSA, the security division of EMC went on the offense -- and fast.

“Documents leaked by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden show that the NSA created and promulgated a flawed formula for generating random numbers to create a ‘back door’ in encryption products, the New York Times reported in September,” Reuters said.

“Undisclosed until now was that RSA received $10 million in a deal that set the NSA formula as the preferred, or default, method for number generation in the BSafe software, according to two sources familiar with the contract. Although that sum might seem paltry, it represented more than a third of the revenue that the relevant division at RSA had taken in during the entire previous year, securities filings show.

A Strong Denial

RSA isn’t taking the allegations lying down. “Recent press coverage has asserted that RSA entered into a “secret contract” with the NSA to incorporate a known flawed random number generator into its BSafe encryption libraries,” RSA said in a statement. “We categorically deny this allegation.”

RSA went on to say that the company has worked with the NSA, both as a vendor and an active member of the security community. The firm emphasized that it has never kept this relationship a secret and in fact has openly publicized it. The EMC subsidiary said its explicit goal has always been to strengthen commercial and government security. Then, the firm offered some key points about its use of Dual EC DRBG in BSafe.

RSA said it made the decision to use Dual EC DRBG as the default in BSafe toolkits in 2004, in the context of an industry-wide effort to develop newer, stronger methods of encryption. At that time, the firm said, the NSA had a trusted role in the community-wide effort to strengthen, not weaken, encryption.

RSA Defends Itself

“This algorithm is only one of multiple choices available within BSafe toolkits, and users have always been free to choose whichever one best suits their needs,” RSA said. “We continued using the algorithm as an option within BSafe toolkits as it gained acceptance as a NIST standard and because of its value in FIPS compliance. When concern surfaced around the algorithm in 2007, we continued to rely upon NIST as the arbiter of that discussion.”

When the NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) issued new guidance recommending no further use of this algorithm in September 2013, RSA said it adhered to that guidance, communicated that recommendation to customers and discussed the change openly in the media.

The firm concluded, “RSA, as a security company, never divulges details of customer engagements, but we also categorically state that we have never entered into any contract or engaged in any project with the intention of weakening RSA’s products, or introducing potential ‘backdoors’ into our products for anyone’s use.”
 

Tell Us What You Think
Comment:

Name:

N:

Posted: 2013-12-24 @ 4:12pm PT
When will you people realize the .com Domain is by default insecure???

Name:

Posted: 2013-12-24 @ 4:08pm PT
Secret documents showing up and still denying it, expecting to keep up trust. Right... good luck!

KARL:

Posted: 2013-12-24 @ 3:56pm PT
Notice they don't say we didn't get 10 million from NSA

joy:

Posted: 2013-12-24 @ 1:14pm PT
ten million can buy a lot

Ketch:

Posted: 2013-12-24 @ 1:14pm PT
Pfffft, suuuuure....liars.

Ben:

Posted: 2013-12-24 @ 1:01pm PT
It sounds like they're denying that they knew that the algorithm was flawed when they took the money.

Why?:

Posted: 2013-12-24 @ 12:54pm PT
You need to look more closely at what they're denying. They aren't denying that for 10 years they sold a security product with a back door in it. They also aren't denying that they took $10 million in payment from the NSA either. They had knowledge since 2007 that this algorithm was not secure and yet they kept it as their default. Why?

jim:

Posted: 2013-12-24 @ 12:52pm PT
It seems like they didn't really deny anything, other than it being a secret they worked with the NSA.com

Doc:

Posted: 2013-12-24 @ 12:51pm PT
yeah they inserted this into the documents before he downlowded them.... they wanted to see how many he docs he would take. are you serious

SLK:

Posted: 2013-12-24 @ 12:30pm PT
Mandy Rice-Davies comes to mind.

maharol:

Posted: 2013-12-24 @ 12:09pm PT
Sure they wouldn't.

aurum79:

Posted: 2013-12-24 @ 12:06pm PT
This story was likely planted in Snowden's data by NSA in order to discredit Snowden. It makes no sense for NSA to take this difficult route by choosing a random number generator. There are much more direct ways to get to a backdoor if you want one badly enough.

A1$sdddke:

Posted: 2013-12-24 @ 11:45am PT
More than one available huh? Maybe we should be looking at their codes and algorithms then.

don:

Posted: 2013-12-24 @ 11:45am PT
I'm sorry: you deny what again?



Neustar, Inc. (NYSE: NSR) is a trusted, neutral provider of real-time information and analysis to the Internet, telecommunications, information services, financial services, retail, media and advertising sectors. Neustar applies its advanced, secure technologies in location, identification, and evaluation to help its customers promote and protect their businesses. More information is available at www.neustar.biz.


 Network Security
1.   Fund Seeks To Head Off Heartbleeds
2.   Lessons from Verizon's Threat Report
3.   Verizon Report Exposes Cyberthreats
4.   How Are Web Sites Post-Heartbleed?
5.   White House Updating Privacy Policy


advertisement
How Are Web Sites Post-Heartbleed?
Questions on open source, security.
Average Rating:
Heartbleed Exploit Could Cost Millions
But it could have been prevented.
Average Rating:
Michaels: Nearly 3M Cards Breached
But the hack has been contained.
Average Rating:
Product Information and Resources for Technology You Can Use To Boost Your Business

Network Security Spotlight
Tech Giants Fund Initiative To Prevent Future Heartbleeds
Can more funding prevent Heartbleed vulnerabilities in future open-source software? A new Core Infrastructure Initiative at the Linux Foundation is attempting to find out.
 
What Verizon's Data Breach Report Can Teach Enterprises
It’s probably not a jaw-dropper, but cyberespionage is officially on the rise. And the use of stolen or misused credentials is still the leading way the bad guys gain access to corporate information.
 
Top Cyberthreats Exposed by Verizon Report
Beyond Heartbleed, there are cyberthreats vying to take down enterprise networks, corrupt smartphones, and wreak havoc on businesses. Verizon is exposing these threats in a new report.
 

Navigation
CRM Daily
Home/Top News | CRM Systems | Customer Service | Business Intelligence | Sales & Marketing | Contact Centers | Customer Data | CRM Press Releases
NewsFactor Network Enterprise I.T. Sites
NewsFactor Technology News | Enterprise Security Today | CRM Daily

NewsFactor Business and Innovation Sites
Sci-Tech Today | NewsFactor Business Report

NewsFactor Services
FreeNewsFeed | Free Newsletters | XML/RSS Feed

About NewsFactor Network | How To Contact Us | Article Reprints | Careers @ NewsFactor | Services for PR Pros | Top Tech Wire | How To Advertise

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
© Copyright 2000-2014 NewsFactor Network. All rights reserved. Article rating technology by Blogowogo. Member of Accuserve Ad Network.